Assignment help

伯恩茅斯大学作业代写: 盖茨道德发展

伯恩茅斯大学作业代写: 盖茨道德发展

正在征求意见的有关情况,由不同的个人代表或有可能产生的伦理问题引发了对如何最好的行动可能威胁到我们的组织文化,以及如何应对任何潜在的威胁,我们的业务现在和未来。伦理审查委员会将召开讨论两个已被报道的问题。某些类型的认可或奖励可能适合那些符合政策的人。

如果情况不符合被怀疑,他们必须研究公司的指导方针;如果违法行为被揭露,他们应该得到相应的惩罚措施。调查和任何行动都应同样适用于所有相关的个人。在行为治疗的任何偏差可以给员工发出错误的信号,政策可能不适用于每个人,反过来又可以鼓励其他的人来测试代码的行为的限制。(m.u.s.e.,2012,第。1)

当我们进入一个新的范式,我们超越官僚对当代道德分析的一个更大的反思。通过积极构建的框架,以指导我们在作出适当的决定,我们学习混合业务推理与伦理标准,最终体现,并预计由伦理理论的选择。它具有更高的推理能力,我们进一步发展我们的管理变革模型,提供了持续实施的行为准则。在这个过程中,我们会发现在我们的文化中既有理想的行为,又有不良的行为。我们将需要确定每一个。

如果我们对功利的模式的做法是所有什么问题好的前提下,我们应该要求那些我们觉得没有辜负我们的行为准则?我们是否会忽略一个错误,如果它是为了所有的好,或我们确定的行为的后果,以确定它是对还是错?我们是否更关心的后果,一个行为而不是行为本身的结果?或者,是第二行为的后果?

我们问为什么一个行为,没有行为的实际后果是什么考虑决定行为的对错吗?换言之,我们的文化在这里指导我们的文化,通过合理的评价我们的行为的后果,或根据责任和原则,应该是什么?如果,事实上,我们测量的“规范性力量作为独立的后果,然后我们确定我们都有自主、自我立法的意志,使我们制定的行为对我们自己的规则系统”(麦克亚当斯,2008,p. 69)。也就是说,根据康德的绝对命令,什么是正确的,一个是正确的,我们每个人都可以发现,通过行使我们的理性能力。因此,我们判断在ECG和她的配偶在政府的盟友先前未公开的财务利益的高管的行为,谁会是利润从收购到主张推进收购由于自身潜在的利润,或者我们应该意识到,努力前进着采集有无关的自少动力的唯一感兴趣的是心电图的可能性。

伯恩茅斯大学作业代写: 盖茨道德发展

Being consulted by various individuals regarding situations that represent or could potentially have ethical implications has given rise to questions as to how to best act on potential threats to our organizational culture, and how to respond to any potential threats to our business now, and in the future. The Ethics Review Committee will convene to discuss two matters that have been reported. Some type of recognition or reward may be appropriate for those who comply with policies.

If situations of noncompliance are suspected, they should be investigated to the company’s guidelines; if violations are uncovered, they should result in appropriate punitive measures. Investigations and any actions should be equally applied to all relevant individuals. Any deviations in the treatment of transgressions could send the wrong signal to employees that policies may not apply to everyone, and in turn may encourage others to test the limits of the code of conduct. (M.U.S.E., 2012, para. 1)

As we venture into a new paradigm, we transcend bureaucracy on a greater reflection of contemporary moral analysis. By proactively constructing the framework to guide us in making appropriate decisions, we learn to blend business reasoning with ethical standards, ultimately embodied, and projected by ethical theory of choice. It’s with a higher reasoning ability that we further develop our management change model that provides for the continuous implementation of the code of conduct. In the process, we will find in our culture both desirable behavior, and undesirable behavior. We will need to identify with each.

If we are acting on the premise of the utilitarian whose mode of operandi is for the good of all what questions should we be asking of those who we feel are not living up to our code of conduct? Do we overlook one wrong if it’s for the good of all, or do we determine the consequence of the act to determine whether it’s right or wrong? Are we more concerned about the consequences, the results of an act rather than the act itself? Or, is the consequence of an act secondary?

Do we ask why an act was committed, and determine the rightness or wrongness of the act without consideration of what the actual consequences of the act are? In other words, do we guide our culture here at ECG by rational evaluation of the consequences of our acts, or according to duty and principle-that, which ought to be? If, in fact, we measure the “prescriptive force as being independent of its consequence, then we determine that all of us have the autonomous, self-legislating wills that permit us to formulate and act on our own systems of rules” (McAdams, 2008, p. 69). That is, according to Kant’s categorical imperative, what is right for one is right for all, and each of us can discover that right by exercising our rational faculties. Thus, are we to judge the act of a senior executive at ECG and her spouse who have a previously undisclosed financial interest in Government Allies, and who will notably profit from the acquisition to have advocated moving forward with the acquisition because of their own potential to profit, or should we realize that the effort to move forward with the acquisition as having an unrelated self-less motive with the possibility of the only interest being that of ECG.

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注