Assignment help

Politics Essay 代写:促进世界的和平

Politics Essay 代写:促进世界的和平

第一种方式,制度创造了国家和国家之间的相互依存关系。国际机构中的国家和州之间的合作,使他们相互依靠,因为他们分享互利共赢,以提高他们的发展。在这一点上,战争是不太可能发生,因为如果战争发生的国家将失去他们的利润和发展也将下降。在这种情况下,最好的例子是亚太经济合作,亚太经合组织。亚太经合组织所有成员都密切合作,共同合作开展贸易(Aggarwal &墨里森,1999)。从历史上看,该国际机构的几个成员是敌人,但是,成为亚太经合组织的成员后,这些国家都是相互合作,相互共享的共同利益,以提高他们的经济增长。因此,成员国之间的战争和冲突是不太可能发生的。除了亚太经合组织、北美自由贸易区也在促进地区和平起着重要的作用。类似的第一个例子,它使各国在经济发展的长期相互依赖,并提供贸易自由流动。此外,美国是这个国际机构的成员之一,不能把压力给其他国家,拥有更少的权力。这意味着它减少了强大的国家的单方面决定。

此外,相互帮助也起着促进世界和平的作用。国际机构确实能够在成员国之间团结。因此,在国际机构中的所有成员都是非常有帮助的,在相互帮助,如果其他成员遇到的问题。他们会尽他们所能帮助受难的成员,以推动他们走出问题。在2009希腊是唯一一个面临偿还债务的国家。因此,在看到这场危机时,所有的欧盟成员国都没有停滞不前,尤其是欧元区(杰克逊,2009)。他们很难找到解决办法,以解决这场危机。因此,他们可以推动希腊走出危机。同样,在2010的爱尔兰,欧盟成员国之一也反驳了类似的问题,像希腊这是金融危机。处理这个问题,所有的欧盟成员国再次试图找到办法,使爱尔兰摆脱这场危机。尽管爱尔兰政府不要求欧盟的帮助,所有的欧盟成员国也仍然试图寻求方法来帮助这个国家(爱尔兰的紧缩措施-下一站违约?,n.d.)。这表明,国际机构是非常重要的,在加强国家的行为,只有一个自我照顾其他生活在同一机构的国家。

最后但并非最不重要的是,国际机构鼓励各国通过和平手段解决争端或冲突。当然,制度自由主义反对国家进行战争,让他们通过谈判解决冲突。这一点可以阐述的情况下,柬埔寨和泰国的边境冲突在2008。柬埔寨和泰国是东盟的成员,和冲突发生时,这两个国家声称一些领土在柏威夏庙地区是自己。虽然冲突已经越来越严重时,这两个国家之间的战争还没有发生因为通过东盟意识,柬埔寨和泰国试图谈判双边和防止战争的发生,(泰国,柬埔寨承诺结束边界冲突,2008)。此外,所有的东盟成员国都试图推动这些国家在东盟的谈判中。制度自由主义作为一种后果,对促进世界和世界的和平,也使所有的人民都和平地生活着,这是非常重要的。

Politics Essay 代写:促进世界的和平

The first way, institution creates the interdependence between states and states. The cooperation between states and states in the international institutions makes them depend on each other because they share the mutual benefit together in order improve their development. Throughout this point, the war is less likely to occur because if the war takes place the states will lose their profit and the development will turn down as well. The best example to that case is the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. All the members of APEC are closely working and cooperating together in order to conduct the trade (Aggarwal & Morrison, 1999). Historically, several members of that international institution were enemy; however, after becoming the member of the APEC, those states are relatively work with each other and share the mutual benefit to improve their economic growth. Hence, the war and conflict among the member states are less likely to happen. Besides APEC, NAFTA also plays an important role in promoting peace in the region. Similar to the first example, it makes the states depend on each other in term of economic development and provides the free flow of trade. Moreover, the U.S which is one of the members of this international institution cannot put the pressure to the other states that have less power. It means that it reduce the unilateral decision of the powerful states.

Furthermore, mutual help also plays a role to encourage the peace to the world. The international institution is really capable to solidify among member states. Thus, all the members in the international institution are very helpful in term of assisting each other if the other members meet the problems. They would try their best to help the suffering members in order to push them out of the problems. During 2009 Greece is the only one country that faces the difficulty in paying debt. Therefore, when seeing this crisis, all the EU members did not stand still, especially the Eurozone (Jackson, 2009). They tried very hard to seek the solutions in order to solve that crisis. As a result, they could push Greece out of the crisis. Similarly, in 2010 the Ireland, one of the EU members also counters the same problem like Greece which is financial crisis. Dealing with this issue, all the EU members again are trying to find the ways to bring the Ireland out of this crisis. Even though the Ireland government does not request the help from the EU, all the EU members also still try to seek the ways to help this country (Ireland’s austerity measures – next stop default?, n.d.). It shows that the international institution is vital in enhancing the states behavior by caring only one self to caring the others that are living in the same institution.

Last but not least, the international institution encourages the states to solve the disputes or conflicts by peaceful means. Of course, the institutional liberalism discourages state to conduct the war and make them to solve the conflict through negotiation. This point can elaborate by the case of Cambodia and Thailand border conflict in 2008. Both Cambodian and Thailand are the members of the ASEAN, and the conflict occurred when these two countries claim the some territory in the Preah Vihear Temple area to be their own. Although the conflict had been more seriously from time to time, the war between these two countries still not occurs yet because through the sense of ASEAN, both Cambodia and Thailand try to negotiation bilaterally and prevent the war to happen (Thailand, Cambodia pledge to end border conflict, 2008). Furthermore, all the ASEAN members try to push these countries to come to negotiation in the ASEAN as well. As consequences, the institutional liberalism is very significant to promoting peace to the regions as well as to the world, and also make all the people live peacefully with one another.

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注