根据以上论述，可以得出结论：科技的滥用给社会留下了负面的影响。这两个作者，虽然从不同的情况下，从个人的经验认识到，技术是造成社会缺乏每天所需的技能。这些技能包括心理，沟通和身体能力。Kolesnikova的经验，如上所述，是作为一个导师和她发现缺乏基本的沟通和写作技能的学生。另一方面，Brende采取了相反的观点，总异常的方法。虽然麻省理工学院毕业，他决定住在一个阿米什类型的社区与他的家人18个月没有任何技术进步。他逐渐意识到，不使用技术对他有利，对于那些不断围绕技术的人来说，他们似乎缺乏多种能力。虽然两者采取不同的方法，结果是相同的。为了说服读者并留下长久的印象，他们最后还用一句吸引人的最后一句话结束了他们的论文。Kolesnikova说，父母和青少年结束战斗现在还是面临一个句子不未来三个字母的单词，OMG（Kolesnikova，624）。不过，另一方面，说明有很大不同，对技术的影响有关。他说，在这样一个世界里的小玩意有余，我们当中最富有的是那些掌握了细化了过量的微妙的艺术，让他们充满人性的表达.
英国发展研究学essay代写:负面的影响
According to the texts stated above, a conclusion can be reached: the abuse of technology is leaving a negative impact on society. Both authors, though from different scenarios, have from personal experience recognized that technology is causing society to lack skills required on a daily basis. These skills include mental, communication, and physical capabilities. Kolesnikova's experience as stated above was as a tutor and she discovered that the students were lacking basic communication/writing skills. On the other hand, Brende took a total opposite view and unusual approach. Although an MIT graduate, he decided to live in an Amish-type community with his family for 18 months without any technological advances. He came to realize that not using technology came to his benefit, and for those who were continually around technology, they seemed to be lacking multiple capabilities. While both took different approaches, the results were the same. To persuade the reader and leave a long lasting impression they also ended their essays with an appealing last sentence. Kolesnikova ended stating that both parents and teens either fight now or face a sentence-less future of the three letter word OMG (Kolesnikova, 624). Brende, on the other hand, stated something quite different, yet relevant to the impact of technology. He stated that in a world superabundant in gadgets and gizmos, the richest among us are those who have mastered the delicate art of thinning out the excess, making way for the expression of their full humanity
