Assignment help

英国商科论文代写:环保声明

惠普的一些环保声明可以被解释为陈词滥调。该公司声称,它想要节约比消耗更多的资源(惠普,2011年)。令人担忧的是,提供这样的声明很容易。然而,要评估它们将如何比消费更多地储蓄,就更加困难了。这是因为环境可接受的再制造方案仍然需要能源消耗,尽管节约了材料。在实践中,惠普的政策可能比报告中传达的政策更糟糕。这是因为供应商可能被迫遵守公司的标准。在占主导地位的跨国公司(如惠普)与其供应商之间存在着权力关系。计算机部件的国际采购使得供应商在惠普占主导地位的购买政策面前不堪一击。在企业社会责任报告中,这些权力关系往往会被忽视,因为企业将希望以有利的方式展现自己。企业社会责任政策受到了批评。企业社会责任政策的制定对许多企业来说都是难以实施的。然而,由于惠普企业社会责任报告中所包含的详细程度,这些批评一般不应针对惠普。可以说,他们为社会做出了诚实的努力(波特和克雷默2002年)。这份报告超越了弗里德曼倡导的法律遵从性。所提供的详细信息与最低的法律合规水平相比,具有更高的标准。

英国商科论文代写:环保声明

Some of Hewlett Packard’s environmental statements can be interpreted as platitudes. The company claims that that it wants to conserve more resources than it consumes (Hewlett Packard 2011). The concern is that it is easy to provide such statements. However, it is more difficult to assess how they are going to conserve more than they consume. This is because environmentally acceptable re-manufacturing programmes will still require energy consumption despite the conservation of the materials.Hewlett Packard may have worse polices, in practice, than those conveyed by its report. This is because suppliers could be forced to comply with the company’s standards. There are power relationships between dominant multi-national companies, such as Hewlett Packard, and their suppliers . The international sourcing of computer components has left suppliers vulnerable to the dominant buying policies at Hewlett Packard. These power relationships will tend to be overlooked, in corporate social responsibility reports, because companies will want to portray themselves in a favourable light.Corporate social responsibility policies have been criticised. The development of CSR policies have been difficult to implement for many firms. However, these criticisms should, generally, not be directed at Hewlett Packard due to the level of detail contained in its CSR report. Arguably, they have made an honest corporate attempt to contribute to society (Porter and Kramer 2002). The report goes beyond the legal compliance advocated by Friedman. The detail provided is of a superior standard when compared to a minimum level of legal compliance.

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注